And until the iPad Pro gains the ability to run macOS apps (or, dare I suggest, macOS), I don’t see that calculus changing. Doing that on the iPad is, comparatively, a mess - I can reasonably look at one or two apps max, resizing is a pain, and it doesn’t take full advantage of my external display.įurthermore, iOS apps still have less functionality than their macOS counterparts across the board. On a MacBook, I can duck in and out of Zoom calls to mess around in Chrome and keep several tabs and applications open on my screen at once. Personally, I just can’t use iPadOS for my daily multitasking workload. (Or it’s a Surface Pro, whatever you want to call that.) Image: Appleīut that’s before you actually use the thing. It can come with up to 2TB of storage and 16GB of RAM. It now supports Thunderbolt 3 and can power additional displays at up to 6K resolution. Let’s review what else the iPad Pro can do. It’s using the same processor that’s in those laptops. To repeat, the new iPad Pro isn’t using a Macbook- adjacent or MacBook- equivalent processor. That’s the same processor that powers its MacBook Air and MacBook Pro (as well as the Mac mini), and it’s exceptional. While the device doesn’t look too different from iPad Pro models of years past, it’s a huge leap forward on the inside because it’s powered by Apple’s eight-core M1 processor. Here’s my reasoning: at Tuesday’s Spring Loaded event, Apple finally unveiled a long-rumored update to its iPad Pro. I think there must be people at Apple who want this, too, so I’m now respectfully requesting that the company stop dilly-dallying and make it happen. Not a clamshell, but a Surface Pro type of deal: a tablet with laptop hardware and a laptop OS. I really would just like Apple’s next iPad Pro to be a laptop.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |